Lakme Products Prices In India

Our battle continues on FAMILY PRIDE!

NO-Pacs

Yes Freedom adheres to

and continues his work on the site Family Pride : we are waiting!

Sore Stomach After Eating Mushrooms

The failure of the local civil unions

are just 143 couples entered the records of civil unions, imposed by municipalities on the left, from Bolzano to Bagheria. We tested and come to terms: it is 0.0098% of the population. It is a total failure ... (Free)

Atrial Sinus Tachycardia

PACS NO: Listen to the interview

Listen to the interview on Radio Weblog PACS to Gianmario Mariniello
By Radioweblog.it
Powered by

What Was Date Of Ganesh Chaturdhi In 1982

Testament: let the numbers! No

Click here for a concise practical guide to portions of an estate: who inherits and who does not!
The "discrimination" of the Institute in his will to give unmarried couples is a major argument of the supporters of civil unions.

Where Did The Name Mount Pinatubo Come From

Pacs. Honestly!

of Gianmario Mariniello
* "Let us frankly: there are no social needs such as to justify a law on de facto couples." Words and music by Francesco D'Agostino, honorary president of the National Bioethics Committee.
Sorry to disagree with Daw , but the words of D'Agostino are entirely acceptable.
As pointed out by Luca Volonte - can be nice or not, shows figures - "the promoters of civil unions or pacs Italian, arrogate to themselves the right to represent, according to Istat, approximately 564 000 employed persons, at least half of which are temporary and waiting for the first or second divorce or close to the wedding, and forget the tax and family policy for the estimated 20 million households is easily understood because at least in Italy, as elsewhere in the Western world, the ideology that behind the pacs. "The words of D'Agostino can be shared more when - as Daw - are opposed to his thesis" problems of couples (not married) who can not enjoy certain legal effects of the typical marriage contract (issues of inheritance, health care etc). "
I state that not choosing marriage rights nor assume duties!
Second, we ourselves - with our initiative that raises the words of Gianfranco Fini - we want to remove the obstacles that the legislation (ie the State) impedes the exercise of freedom in matters of inheritance, for example. In Italy the institute
executor is too hard? True! But to solve the problem takes the PACS? That is another law, another legal institution, another coordination rules written several decades later? Or just a reform of the succession?
question ... We do not want the PACS to be seen - especially from the world homosexual - as a fetish, as a policy objective to be achieved at any cost, in an attempt - yes, ideological - to make everything the same or any relative, with the aim of creating a legal arrangement that gives the rights of marriage without assuming the duties. PACS NO!

* National Directorate Youth Action
PS: This blog adheres to the campaign "Family Pride" launched by the Provincial Federation of Youth Action Naples

Sink Pressure Release Valve Dishwasher

The family has no equal!

I am a daily reader A Conservative Mind, the blog of Fausto Carioti that name recalls the famous (in the U.S.) book by Russell Kirk. Today his site I learned that the British Conservative Party has done an analysis on the social function of the family and the results are "politically incorrect" ...

You can tell, no one is offended, that the traditional family model, one with a father, a mother and a son (or maybe two or three children, so as not to condemn the human race to extinction), with two married parents regularly (where, if in church, community, synagogue or other is their business) model is a much more healthy, that is less dangerous for those who belong and the rest of society, models of so-called "alternative"? It can be said that the plans with which many European social welfare fund these alternative unions, in place of the traditional family model, along with affirmative action projects in the various rankings that reward public single parents end up encouraging the breakup of the family, and that the first pay the price it is the children of these unions alternatives? And 'what emerges from a recent, monumental statistical study on the population of England commissioned by independent authors Tories, the Conservative Party.
The survey, entitled "Breakdown Britain" (Full text here , here summary, the chapter on family here ), jump out many truths that common sense is not difficult to understand, but go in the opposite direction to think great touted by the media and the models offered by Western pop culture, namely that the families 'different' are not only beautiful, but they are even better and certainly more "trendy" to those based on matrimonio.I report data, alarming from any point of view you look at them, they say:
marriages provide a far more stable environment for both parents and their children, the greater resistance of marriages compared to cohabitation is especially evident in moments of crisis or stress, such as those related to the early years of life figli.La separation of unmarried couples is the main reason for the formation of single-parent families in the United Kingdom. With the same income bracket, before the third birthday of the child is already having a separate 32% of unmarried couples, the same date, between the pairs related by marriage, only 6 out of a hundred families have separate.Il low rate of separation regularly married couples can be explained by a variety of factors, including greater involvement of fathers in raising their children and better communication within the famiglia.Oggi in England 15% of children are born and grow without having next one parent, usually the father. Their number is steadily increasing.
levels of antisocial behavior and delinquency are higher in children from separated families than in families not separate.Il 70 per cent of young people identified as responsible for acts of violence come from families with only one of the seventeen that genitore.Tra living without a parent is more than the risk of drinking alcohol at least weekly (1.3 times) and drugs (1.5 times).
a sample of 2,447 adults, those who grew up with only one parent had more school failure, more problems with drug addiction and alcoholism, serious debt problems and / or unemployment and dependency from assistance pubblica.I British taxpayers pay each year over 20 billion pounds, equal to € 30 billion to cover the economic costs caused by the breakup homely tax policies are partly responsible for the situation: parents from low-income groups are likely to be heavily penalized if they are united by a bond official. In other words, wanting to help the families with one parent, the British Treasury has done to make it economically unsuitable marriage, thereby encouraging the creation of alternative ties. But the collapse of marriages, as seen in the medium term has led to high costs, social and economic.
would be interesting to see the results of a similar study conducted on the Italian population. If only in this country there was a conservative party.

Freds Application Online

Pacs No, Yes, freedom of thought Enrico Oliari

Thanks to the activism of Ulderico De Laurentiis, we got in touch with Oliari Henry, national manager of GayLib , the association of gay liberal center-right, which has expressed some thoughts that surely help the debate on our initiative, which is to be considered open to thoughts of anyone who wishes to intervene.
To join the discussion just send an email to gianmario.mariniello @ libero.it or even more directly expressing their views in the comments.
I remind you finally sign our petition !

course I am referring to the words of President Fini, who, for obvious reasons, I am the first to want and need support.

However, if I may, rebuke to the party a lack of preparation in the field: what could be granted to unmarried couples? And to those omoaffettive? What is the difference between civil unions and the recognition of individual rights with the couple? Why do you want to lay an Italy, but then you are afraid to call "family" a couple omoaffettiva? Why the European Right, beginning with Le Pen, but also more moderate, they have a completely different view from ours? The proposed Fini is identical to that contained in the program of the Union? These are the questions we will ask our political opponents, for whom it is necessary to have clear ideas and that you need to give right answers.
When it comes to civil unions, there is already talk of individual rights. It is in fact a "civil pact of solidarity", a pact between two people who belong to a couple, where each component carries certain individual rights.
On the other hand if it recognizes the "right of individual member of the couple" will automatically recognize the concept of "couple": the one that goes out the door, through the window. What President
purposes outlined in its opening to the recognition of individual rights of members of the couple, is a concept which in France is called civil unions. E ', in other words, the same thing, we can call it like we want (and this could be a strategy!), But the substance does not change. So much so that even in France the civil unions is not marriage.
I see as an error term dialectic "No civil unions, yes, individual rights," because it makes little sense to fight a law with the application for the approval of another right.
Personally I can not participate in the campaign "No civil unions, yes, individual rights," because they are the same. And also because I am convinced that, as happened during the divorce, it is a mistake to leave left the monopoly of a struggle for freedom is so important, especially at this time where our open positions have exceeded them, throwing them into turmoil. Who said that on such an important issue and that affects millions of people, we must always remain a step back from the coterie Prodi - Binetti - D'Alema, especially at a time like this where trudging on ethical issues? We are one of the last of the fifteen European countries to legislate on the subject (together with Greece) and we all know that this or that result sooner or later we come: because for once there we carry on and get over the messy Left?

I am extremely available to participate in the debate, I greet you cordially
,
Enrico Oliari

Dried Cranberries Lisine

Sign the Online Petition! Join

Click here!