Freds Application Online

Pacs No, Yes, freedom of thought Enrico Oliari

Thanks to the activism of Ulderico De Laurentiis, we got in touch with Oliari Henry, national manager of GayLib , the association of gay liberal center-right, which has expressed some thoughts that surely help the debate on our initiative, which is to be considered open to thoughts of anyone who wishes to intervene.
To join the discussion just send an email to gianmario.mariniello @ libero.it or even more directly expressing their views in the comments.
I remind you finally sign our petition !

course I am referring to the words of President Fini, who, for obvious reasons, I am the first to want and need support.

However, if I may, rebuke to the party a lack of preparation in the field: what could be granted to unmarried couples? And to those omoaffettive? What is the difference between civil unions and the recognition of individual rights with the couple? Why do you want to lay an Italy, but then you are afraid to call "family" a couple omoaffettiva? Why the European Right, beginning with Le Pen, but also more moderate, they have a completely different view from ours? The proposed Fini is identical to that contained in the program of the Union? These are the questions we will ask our political opponents, for whom it is necessary to have clear ideas and that you need to give right answers.
When it comes to civil unions, there is already talk of individual rights. It is in fact a "civil pact of solidarity", a pact between two people who belong to a couple, where each component carries certain individual rights.
On the other hand if it recognizes the "right of individual member of the couple" will automatically recognize the concept of "couple": the one that goes out the door, through the window. What President
purposes outlined in its opening to the recognition of individual rights of members of the couple, is a concept which in France is called civil unions. E ', in other words, the same thing, we can call it like we want (and this could be a strategy!), But the substance does not change. So much so that even in France the civil unions is not marriage.
I see as an error term dialectic "No civil unions, yes, individual rights," because it makes little sense to fight a law with the application for the approval of another right.
Personally I can not participate in the campaign "No civil unions, yes, individual rights," because they are the same. And also because I am convinced that, as happened during the divorce, it is a mistake to leave left the monopoly of a struggle for freedom is so important, especially at this time where our open positions have exceeded them, throwing them into turmoil. Who said that on such an important issue and that affects millions of people, we must always remain a step back from the coterie Prodi - Binetti - D'Alema, especially at a time like this where trudging on ethical issues? We are one of the last of the fifteen European countries to legislate on the subject (together with Greece) and we all know that this or that result sooner or later we come: because for once there we carry on and get over the messy Left?

I am extremely available to participate in the debate, I greet you cordially
,
Enrico Oliari