I am a daily reader A Conservative Mind, the blog of Fausto Carioti that name recalls the famous (in the U.S.) book by Russell Kirk. Today his site I learned that the British Conservative Party has done an analysis on the social function of the family and the results are "politically incorrect" ...
You can tell, no one is offended, that the traditional family model, one with a father, a mother and a son (or maybe two or three children, so as not to condemn the human race to extinction), with two married parents regularly (where, if in church, community, synagogue or other is their business) model is a much more healthy, that is less dangerous for those who belong and the rest of society, models of so-called "alternative"? It can be said that the plans with which many European social welfare fund these alternative unions, in place of the traditional family model, along with affirmative action projects in the various rankings that reward public single parents end up encouraging the breakup of the family, and that the first pay the price it is the children of these unions alternatives? And 'what emerges from a recent, monumental statistical study on the population of England commissioned by independent authors Tories, the Conservative Party.
The survey, entitled "Breakdown Britain" (Full text here , here summary, the chapter on family here ), jump out many truths that common sense is not difficult to understand, but go in the opposite direction to think great touted by the media and the models offered by Western pop culture, namely that the families 'different' are not only beautiful, but they are even better and certainly more "trendy" to those based on matrimonio.I report data, alarming from any point of view you look at them, they say:
marriages provide a far more stable environment for both parents and their children, the greater resistance of marriages compared to cohabitation is especially evident in moments of crisis or stress, such as those related to the early years of life figli.La separation of unmarried couples is the main reason for the formation of single-parent families in the United Kingdom. With the same income bracket, before the third birthday of the child is already having a separate 32% of unmarried couples, the same date, between the pairs related by marriage, only 6 out of a hundred families have separate.Il low rate of separation regularly married couples can be explained by a variety of factors, including greater involvement of fathers in raising their children and better communication within the famiglia.Oggi in England 15% of children are born and grow without having next one parent, usually the father. Their number is steadily increasing.
levels of antisocial behavior and delinquency are higher in children from separated families than in families not separate.Il 70 per cent of young people identified as responsible for acts of violence come from families with only one of the seventeen that genitore.Tra living without a parent is more than the risk of drinking alcohol at least weekly (1.3 times) and drugs (1.5 times).
a sample of 2,447 adults, those who grew up with only one parent had more school failure, more problems with drug addiction and alcoholism, serious debt problems and / or unemployment and dependency from assistance pubblica.I British taxpayers pay each year over 20 billion pounds, equal to € 30 billion to cover the economic costs caused by the breakup homely tax policies are partly responsible for the situation: parents from low-income groups are likely to be heavily penalized if they are united by a bond official. In other words, wanting to help the families with one parent, the British Treasury has done to make it economically unsuitable marriage, thereby encouraging the creation of alternative ties. But the collapse of marriages, as seen in the medium term has led to high costs, social and economic.
would be interesting to see the results of a similar study conducted on the Italian population. If only in this country there was a conservative party.
0 comments:
Post a Comment